DATE: 01/23/2006 COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS - PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:44:10 2005 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL DETAIL REPT: PTS428 252/Young VRSN: W 252-903/Olney ISD ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (3) # STRATUM CATEGORY LOCAL VALUE STRATUM RATIO STATE VALUE SAMPLE SIZE TOTAL PARCELS STRATUM VARIANCE _________ ________ ___________ _____________ ___________ ___________ _____________ ________________ 1 A 9,955,102 1.0639 9,357,178 14 559 .064887815 2 A 9,947,274 1.0203 9,749,362 10 257 .056314358 3 A 9,950,190 1.0355 9,609,068 10 174 .023593719 4 A 9,944,786 0.9324 10,665,794 11 112 .011639484 5 D3 10,170,950 0.9333 10,897,836 20 1,386 .039411022 6 F1 1,531,919 0.9807 1,562,067 7 79 .021656453 7 F1 1,510,756 0.9446 1,599,361 8 34 .007634500 8 F1 1,565,818 0.9843 1,590,793 6 12 .001055412 9 G1 3,686,250 1.0337 3,566,073 9 66 .062536980 10 G1 3,666,470 0.9631 3,806,946 7 19 .024227544 11 G1 3,755,380 0.9826 3,821,881 5 10 .018762511 12 G1 3,440,220 1.1271 3,052,276 3 4 .011029149 RANDOM TOTALS: 69,125,115 69,278,635 110 2,712 CATG J EXCEPTION VALUES: 7,971,170 7,257,959 CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: 11,058,270 9,972,033 CATG F1 EXCEPTION VALUES: 1,214,270 1,460,106 TOTAL TEST VALUES (4): 89,368,825 87,968,733 MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT: 5.0000004 MARGIN OF ERROR VALUE: 4,398,437 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES (5): STATE LOWER LIMIT: 83,570,296 (STATE TEST VALUE MINUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT) LOCAL TEST VALUE: 89,368,825 (WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL) STATE UPPER LIMIT: 92,367,170 (STATE TEST VALUE PLUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT) VALUE ASSIGNED (6): 110,648,802 (SEE ISD SUMMARY WORKSHEET) SOURCES: (1) SEE STRATIFIED CATEGORY WORKSHEET REPORTS PTS236, PTS430 (2) NUMBER OF PARCELS SAMPLED BY STAFF (3) TOTAL CATEGORY PARCELS FROM STRATIFICATION REPORT APPRAISAL ROLL, OR SELF-REPORT (4) INCLUDES ANY PARCELS IN A, B, C, D3, F1, G1, G2,OR L1 MARKED AS EXCEPTION PROPERTIES (5) UNSTUDIED CATEGORIES AND SUB-CATEGORIES WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES
