DATE: 06/29/2006 COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS - PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:42:12 2005 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL DETAIL REPT: PTS428 048/Concho VRSN: W 048-901/Eden CISD ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (3) # STRATUM CATEGORY LOCAL VALUE STRATUM RATIO STATE VALUE SAMPLE SIZE TOTAL PARCELS STRATUM VARIANCE _________ ________ ___________ _____________ ___________ ___________ _____________ ________________ 1 A 4,284,434 0.9660 4,435,232 15 234 .009661218 2 A 4,295,062 0.8716 4,927,790 15 124 .072638892 3 A 4,237,184 0.9415 4,500,461 15 82 .039894436 4 A 4,258,877 0.8708 4,890,764 15 50 .014426838 5 D3 15,539,210 0.9168 16,949,400 20 2,805 .034637032 6 F1 1,271,860 0.9185 1,384,714 6 57 .008237303 7 F1 1,278,998 1.0310 1,240,541 5 17 .008492273 8 F1 1,141,153 1.0291 1,108,884 3 6 .039354625 9 G1 3,813,208 1.0847 3,515,449 8 26 .016841914 10 G1 3,540,764 1.1029 3,210,413 4 5 .032802473 11 G1 4,521,110 0.9788 4,619,034 2 3 .001214869 RANDOM TOTALS: 48,181,860 50,782,682 108 3,409 CATG J EXCEPTION VALUES: 3,005,167 2,981,765 CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: 24,983,410 23,569,849 CATG F1 EXCEPTION VALUES: 1,284,680 1,308,788 CATG G1 EXCEPTION VALUES: 7,555,921 8,393,248 TOTAL TEST VALUES (4): 85,011,038 87,036,332 MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT: 5.0000005 MARGIN OF ERROR VALUE: 4,351,817 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES (5): STATE LOWER LIMIT: 82,684,515 (STATE TEST VALUE MINUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT) LOCAL TEST VALUE: 85,011,038 (WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL) STATE UPPER LIMIT: 91,388,149 (STATE TEST VALUE PLUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT) VALUE ASSIGNED (6): 111,027,274 (SEE ISD SUMMARY WORKSHEET) SOURCES: (1) SEE STRATIFIED CATEGORY WORKSHEET REPORTS PTS236, PTS430 (2) NUMBER OF PARCELS SAMPLED BY STAFF (3) TOTAL CATEGORY PARCELS FROM STRATIFICATION REPORT APPRAISAL ROLL, OR SELF-REPORT (4) INCLUDES ANY PARCELS IN A, B, C, D3, F1, G1, G2,OR L1 MARKED AS EXCEPTION PROPERTIES (5) UNSTUDIED CATEGORIES AND SUB-CATEGORIES WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES
