Skip to content
Quick Start for:

DATE: 06/22/2005                         COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS - PROPERTY TAX DIVISION                         PAGE:      1
TIME: 11:06:32                                       2004 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL DETAIL                                    REPT: PTS428
                                                              105/Hays                                                  VRSN:      W
                                                        105-902/San Marcos CISD
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
         (1)           (1)                (1)              (1)                (1)              (2)            (3)
      # STRATUM     CATEGORY          LOCAL VALUE     STRATUM RATIO       STATE VALUE      SAMPLE SIZE    TOTAL PARCELS
      _________     ________          ___________     _____________       ___________      ___________    _____________

           1           A              238,435,694        0.9181           259,705,581               57            3,549
           2           A              238,212,032        0.9825           242,454,994               57            2,003
           3           A              238,326,905        1.0127           235,338,111               56            1,430
           4           A              238,290,624        0.9941           239,704,883               44              914
           5           B               83,648,008        0.9921            84,314,089               15              405
           6           B               85,456,172        1.0284            83,096,239                7               33
           7           B               82,693,466        0.9838            84,055,160                6               12
           8           B               82,599,249        1.0083            81,919,319                4                7
           9           F1              96,927,006        1.0482            92,469,954                7              407
          10           F1              97,112,814        0.9744            99,664,218                7              135
          11           F1              96,492,174        0.9336           103,354,942                6               46
          12           F1              96,262,977        1.0217            94,218,437                5               10
          13           L1              44,273,579        1.0052            44,044,547                7              499
          14           L1              43,948,280        1.0068            43,651,450                7              150
          15           L1              44,395,101        1.0053            44,161,047                7               60
          16           L1              43,856,951        1.0208            42,963,314                5               15
  RANDOM TOTALS:                    1,850,931,032                       1,875,116,285              297            9,675
  CATG J  EXCEPTION VALUES:            41,195,061                          42,601,608
  CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES:             9,177,050                           8,956,182
 TOTAL TEST VALUES (4):             1,901,303,143                       1,926,674,075
 MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT:               5.0000000
 MARGIN OF ERROR VALUE:                96,333,704
 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES (5):
   STATE LOWER LIMIT:               1,830,340,371 (STATE TEST VALUE MINUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT)
   LOCAL TEST VALUE:                1,901,303,143 (WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL)
   STATE UPPER LIMIT:               2,023,007,779 (STATE TEST VALUE PLUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT)
 VALUE ASSIGNED (6):                2,438,159,621 (SEE ISD SUMMARY WORKSHEET)

 SOURCES:
 (1) SEE STRATIFIED CATEGORY WORKSHEET REPORTS PTS236, PTS430
 (2) NUMBER OF PARCELS SAMPLED BY STAFF
 (3) TOTAL CATEGORY PARCELS FROM STRATIFICATION REPORT APPRAISAL ROLL, OR SELF-REPORT
 (4) INCLUDES ANY PARCELS IN A, B, C, D3, F1, G1, G2,OR L1 MARKED AS EXCEPTION PROPERTIES
 (5) UNSTUDIED CATEGORIES AND SUB-CATEGORIES WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES