DATE: 06/22/2005 COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS - PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:55:42 2004 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL DETAIL REPT: PTS428 031/Cameron VRSN: W 031-901/Brownsville ISD ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (3) # STRATUM CATEGORY LOCAL VALUE STRATUM RATIO STATE VALUE SAMPLE SIZE TOTAL PARCELS _________ ________ ___________ _____________ ___________ ___________ _____________ 1 A 550,821,717 0.9375 587,543,165 50 14,294 2 A 550,896,426 0.9741 565,544,016 58 8,591 3 A 550,868,150 0.9753 564,819,184 54 5,887 4 A 550,795,228 0.9729 566,137,556 61 3,188 5 C 54,611,999 0.9890 55,219,413 7 4,120 6 C 52,042,745 0.9282 56,068,460 7 2,163 7 C 53,200,290 0.9638 55,198,475 7 715 8 C 53,237,248 1.0189 52,249,728 7 178 9 F1 195,079,437 0.7501 260,071,240 12 1,072 10 F1 194,926,832 0.9694 201,079,876 7 331 11 F1 196,782,888 0.9629 204,364,823 8 115 12 F1 192,445,345 0.9399 204,750,872 6 28 13 L1 74,565,483 0.9967 74,812,364 7 1,130 14 L1 74,774,484 0.9670 77,326,250 7 259 15 L1 77,061,086 0.9948 77,463,898 7 66 16 L1 71,839,483 1.0332 69,531,052 5 12 RANDOM TOTALS: 3,493,948,841 3,672,180,372 310 42,149 CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: 4,854,253 3,533,465 TOTAL TEST VALUES (4): 3,498,803,094 3,675,713,837 MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT: 5.0000000 MARGIN OF ERROR VALUE: 183,785,692 CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES (5): STATE LOWER LIMIT: 3,491,928,145 (STATE TEST VALUE MINUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT) LOCAL TEST VALUE: 3,498,803,094 (WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL) STATE UPPER LIMIT: 3,859,499,529 (STATE TEST VALUE PLUS MARGIN OF ERROR PERCENT) VALUE ASSIGNED (6): 3,646,446,868 (SEE ISD SUMMARY WORKSHEET) SOURCES: (1) SEE STRATIFIED CATEGORY WORKSHEET REPORTS PTS236, PTS430 (2) NUMBER OF PARCELS SAMPLED BY STAFF (3) TOTAL CATEGORY PARCELS FROM STRATIFICATION REPORT APPRAISAL ROLL, OR SELF-REPORT (4) INCLUDES ANY PARCELS IN A, B, C, D3, F1, G1, G2,OR L1 MARKED AS EXCEPTION PROPERTIES (5) UNSTUDIED CATEGORIES AND SUB-CATEGORIES WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL VALUES
